Faith Nyasuguta
Arikana Chihombori-Quao, the former African Union ambassador to the United States, has sparked debate with her bold critique of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). In a recent interview with journalist Steve Clemons, Chihombori-Quao described USAID as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” accusing the agency of pursuing a “major meddling agenda” across Africa under the guise of aid and development.
Chihombori-Quao argued that the demise of USAID’s influence in Africa, particularly during the Trump administration, should not be seen as a loss but rather as an opportunity for the continent to redefine its path. She claimed that despite decades of involvement in education and healthcare projects, USAID has little to show for its efforts.
Instead, she alleged that the agency often destabilized African nations by promoting agendas tied to environmental, human rights, and social justice issues, which she believes were not always aligned with the continent’s priorities.
The former ambassador emphasized the need for African leaders to adopt a more self-reliant approach to development. She criticized the tendency of some African governments to seek stronger ties with the United States, stating, “It takes two to tango.” According to Chihombori-Quao, Africa should not beg for better relations with a country that appears disinterested in genuine partnership. Instead, she urged African nations to focus on building internal capacity and fostering collaborations that prioritize the continent’s interests.
Chihombori-Quao’s remarks come at a time when the role of foreign aid in Africa is increasingly scrutinized. Critics of USAID have long argued that its programs often serve U.S. geopolitical interests rather than addressing the root causes of poverty and underdevelopment. Supporters, however, contend that the agency has made significant contributions to improving healthcare, education, and infrastructure in many African countries.
Her comments also highlight broader concerns about the dynamics of international aid and the balance of power between donor and recipient nations. By calling for a reevaluation of Africa’s reliance on foreign assistance, Chihombori-Quao challenges the continent to take greater control of its development agenda.
This provocative perspective invites a deeper conversation about the future of aid in Africa and the importance of partnerships that respect the sovereignty and aspirations of African nations. Chihombori-Quao’s critique serves as a rallying cry for a more self-determined and empowered Africa.
RELATED:
