Faith Nyasuguta
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has strongly dismissed Donald Trump’s accusations that South Africa is engaging in land confiscation, insisting that the country’s sovereignty is more important than external aid from the United States.
He has however, indicated that he looks forward to engaging with Trump on the issues. “We look forward to engaging with the Trump administration over our land reform policy and issues of bilateral interest. We are certain that out of those engagements, we will share a better and common understanding over these matters,” Ramaphosa said in a statement issued by the presidency.
The dispute erupted after Trump, via his Truth Social platform, claimed that South Africa was “confiscating land” and “treating certain classes of people very badly.” He further announced that the US would cut all future funding to the country pending an investigation.
Ramaphosa Defends Land Policy
Responding on his X (formerly Twitter) handle, Ramaphosa defended South Africa’s land reform policies, which aim to address historical land injustices. He stated:
“South Africa is a constitutional democracy deeply rooted in the rule of law, justice, and equality. The recently adopted Expropriation Act is not a confiscation instrument but a constitutionally mandated legal process that ensures public access to land in an equitable and just manner.”
He also emphasized that South Africa’s laws protect property rights, similar to legal frameworks in the United States and other nations.
The Expropriation Act, signed into law last month, allows the government, under specific circumstances, to compensate property owners with “nil compensation” if the land is acquired in the public interest. However, Pretoria maintains that the process is lawful and does not involve arbitrary land seizures.
Trump and Musk’s Concerns
Trump’s stance echoes concerns from Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a South African-born billionaire, who has been vocal about his opposition to the policy. Conservative critics fear a repeat of Zimbabwe’s land seizures, which led to economic turmoil after commercial farms were taken without compensation.
However, Ramaphosa dismissed these comparisons, saying, “We are certain that through engagement, a better and common understanding will be reached over these matters.”
US Aid vs. South Africa’s Economy
Trump’s decision to cut aid has sparked debate on its potential impact. Ramaphosa, however, downplayed concerns, stressing that US assistance forms only a small fraction of South Africa’s budget.
“Our sovereignty is more significant than external aid from the US,” he asserted, reinforcing the country’s commitment to economic self-sufficiency.
As the diplomatic tension unfolds, the question remains: Will Trump’s decision affect South Africa’s economy, or will the nation push forward with its land reform plans undeterred?
RELATED:
