Faith Nyasuguta
Six transgender service members are challenging a Trump administration executive order that restricts their military service, arguing it is unconstitutional and discriminatory.
President Donald Trump’s executive order, signed on Monday, states that adopting a gender identity different from one’s assigned sex at birth contradicts the military’s values of honor, truthfulness, and discipline. The order further claims that allowing transgender individuals to serve undermines unit cohesion and introduces ideological conflicts into the armed forces.
The policy reinforces existing Defense Department rules that require service members to be free from medical conditions or physical limitations that demand extensive treatment. The administration argues that medical procedures associated with transitioning, such as hormone therapy and surgery, do not align with the rigorous physical and mental standards expected of military personnel.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Secretary of Homeland Security were tasked with monitoring the policy’s implementation and making recommendations on how best to enforce it.
Legal Challenge and Plaintiffs
Six active-duty transgender service members and two prospective enlistees have filed a lawsuit against the administration, alleging the policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment. They are asking a federal court in Washington, D.C., to block its enforcement.
The lawsuit, filed by the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), argues that the policy is not based on military effectiveness but rather on prejudice against transgender individuals.
“Rather than being based on any legitimate governmental purpose, the ban reflects animosity toward transgender people because of their transgender status,” the suit claims.
The plaintiffs include highly decorated service members, such as a Bronze Star recipient, a Sailor of the Year honoree, and individuals awarded meritorious service medals. Among them are:
–U.S. Army Reserves Lt. Nicolas Talbott
–Army Maj. Erica Vandal
–Army Sgt. First Class Kate Cole
–Army Capt. Gordon Herrero
–Navy Ensign Dany Danridge
–Air Force Master Sgt. Jamie Hash
–Koda Nature and Cael Neary (both aspiring enlistees)
Personal Stories of Those Affected
For many of the plaintiffs, the policy threatens their careers and aspirations in the military. Kate Cole, who has served in the Army for 17 years, says removing qualified transgender soldiers weakens the armed forces.
“Removing qualified transgender soldiers like me means an exodus of experienced personnel who fill key positions and can’t be easily replaced, putting the burden on our fellow soldiers left behind,” she stated. “That’s just wrong—it destabilizes our armed forces.”
Cole, who served in combat in Afghanistan, emphasized that transgender soldiers serve with the same dedication as their peers.
Army Capt. Gordon Herrero, who comes from a family with a long history of military service, expressed frustration over the policy.
“There’s nothing about being transgender that makes me better or worse than any other soldier I serve alongside,” Herrero said. “We are all here because we are committed to our country, and we are passionate, willing, and able to serve effectively.”
Legal and Political Implications
Legal experts argue that the executive order is unconstitutional. Shannon Minter, legal director at NCLR, stated, “The law is very clear that the government can’t base policies on disapproval of particular groups of people. That’s animus. And animus-based laws are presumed to be invalid and unconstitutional.”
The lawsuit comes as Trump and Hegseth pledge to eliminate “woke” policies in the military, focusing instead on building a lethal and efficient fighting force. The administration claims that gender identity policies compromise military readiness and discipline.
“Recently, however, the Armed Forces have been afflicted with radical gender ideology to appease activists unconcerned with the requirements of military service like physical and mental health, selflessness, and unit cohesion,” the order states.
The Road Ahead
As the lawsuit moves forward, its outcome could have significant implications for transgender rights in the military. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could block the policy and reaffirm the rights of transgender individuals to serve. If upheld, the order could mark a step back for LGBTQ+ rights within the armed forces.
RELATED:
