Faith Nyasuguta
In a pivotal moment at the United Nations’ highest court, South Africa has made a compelling accusation, asserting that Israel is engaged in genocide in Gaza.
This declaration was accompanied by a fervent plea for the court to urgently intervene and instruct Israel to cease its military operations in the region. However, it’s crucial to note that Israel vehemently rejects these allegations.
The legal proceedings unfolded at the Peace Palace in The Hague, where South African lawyers presented their case, framing the recent Gaza conflict as part of a protracted history of Palestinian oppression by Israel. The legal team urged the judges to issue binding preliminary orders on Israel, including an immediate cessation of its military campaign in Gaza.
Adila Hassim, a South African lawyer, passionately stated during the proceedings, “Genocides are never declared in advance, but this court has the benefit of the past 13 weeks of evidence that shows incontrovertibly a pattern of conduct and related intention that justifies as a plausible claim of genocidal acts.” She stressed that only an order from the court could alleviate the ongoing suffering in the region.
The legal clash has broader implications, delving into the core identities of both nations. For Israel, it raises questions about its national identity as a Jewish state, created in the aftermath of the Nazi genocide during the Holocaust.
On the other hand, for South Africa, this comparison is deeply rooted in its own history. The African National Congress, the ruling party in South Africa, has long drawn parallels between Israel’s policies in Gaza and the West Bank and its own experience under the apartheid regime, which enforced white minority rule until 1994.
While Israel typically views international tribunals as biased and unfair, it has sent a robust legal team to defend its military operations initiated after the October 7 attacks by Hamas. The legal dispute also carries political weight, intertwining with global geopolitics.
The hearings prompted contrasting demonstrations outside the courthouse, with pro-Israeli protesters advocating for the return of hostages held by Hamas and others waving Israeli and Dutch flags. Simultaneously, supporters of South Africa’s move waved the Palestinian flag, emphasizing the broader significance of the case.
The legal battle comes at a time when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has reignited, leading to devastating consequences for the residents of Gaza.
The offensive by Israel, in response to the October 7 attacks, has resulted in significant casualties, with more than 23,200 Palestinians killed, according to the Health Ministry in Hamas-run Gaza. Disturbingly, the death toll includes a substantial number of women and children, reflecting the severe humanitarian crisis in the region.
The legal narrative put forth by South Africa seeks to extend the case beyond the specific events surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict. Ronald Lamola, South Africa’s Justice Minister, emphasized that the violence and destruction in Palestine and Israel did not commence on October 7, 2023. Instead, he argued that Palestinians have endured systematic oppression and violence for the last 76 years.
Vusimuzi Madonsela, co-leader of South Africa’s delegation, asserted, “at the outset, South Africa acknowledges that the genocidal acts and omissions by the state of Israel inevitably form part of a continuum of illegal acts perpetrated against the people of the Palestinian people since 1948,” referring to the year of Israel’s declaration of independence.
In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country’s actions in a video statement, categorically denying any intent to permanently occupy Gaza or displace its civilian population.
He underscored that Israel is targeting Hamas terrorists, not the Palestinian population, and is operating in full compliance with international law. Netanyahu also highlighted Israel’s efforts to minimize civilian casualties, contrasting it with Hamas’s alleged use of Palestinian civilians as human shields.
The legal proceedings in The Hague illuminate the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, bringing it under the scrutiny of international law.
As the court deliberates and prepares to issue interim orders, the case holds the potential to shape the narrative surrounding the conflict and influence the ongoing diplomatic efforts to bring about peace in the region.
RELATED:
